Does Over-Inflating Your Tires Improve Gas Mileage?

Updated on December 28, 2016

Tire Pressure and Gas Mileage

Dial tire pressure gauge
Dial tire pressure gauge

You read and hear about this all the time. Be sure to keep your tires properly inflated because low tire pressure will reduce your gas mileage. You also hear that inflating your tires to the maximum sidewall limit also improves gas mileage. At first thought, it intuitively makes sense that maxing out your tire pressure would work. After all, gas is basically energy for your car and the more difficult it is to propel your vehicle, the more energy that will be used doing it. If you have ever pushed a wheelbarrow with a poorly inflated tire you quickly realize it takes a lot more effort to push than if it had a fully inflated tire. More effort to propel your car should show up as higher gas consumption so it only seems right that miles per gallon would increase with firmer tires.

Recently, however, I came across a couple of articles on the internet that claimed tire pressure doesn’t have much of an effect on gas mileage. One article was by Edmunds and the other by Popular Mechanics.

Being an inquisitive person I wanted to test these claims for myself with my own car and with my own driving habits and routine.

The Test

My 2008 Subaru Forester
My 2008 Subaru Forester | Source

So, to test out the notion that higher tire pressure results in better gas mileage I decided to run a little study to look at gas consumption for properly-inflated tires compared to over-inflated tires.

I drive a 2008 Subaru Forester with Michelin Primacy tires that are one and a half years old with 15,000 miles of wear. My plan is to drive several weeks at the Subaru manual recommended air pressure of 29 psi front/28 psi rear and several weeks at a pressure of 40 psi front/39 psi rear, just under the Michelin sidewall maximum of 44 psi, and plot the results as gas mileage versus tire pressure.

I will try to keep my driving patterns as consistent as possible. I will only use my car to drive back and forth to work and for errands on the weekend and no long trips. I drive the same 22 mile route to and from work every day. I do more driving on the weekend, but this is usually for errands such as dropping off the recycling, going grocery shopping, and visiting a few other shops and stores. My weekly mileage total usually falls somewhere between 150 and 200 miles. I buy gas from the same Marathon gas station and always use the same 87 octane grade. I don’t do any heavy hauling other than some groceries, so I’m not consuming gas towing items or carrying extra weight. My air conditioning, heater, and radio usage is also fairly consistent. I also consider myself a pretty mild-mannered driver which means I don’t accelerate rapidly from red lights, I don’t slam on the brakes at stop signs, and I tend to coast to stops. I don’t always follow the speed limit on interstates, but I don’t speed excessively either.

I will use the same dial indicator pressure gauge to check my pressure to avoid introducing measurement error of another gauge into the equation. I will also purchase gas at the same pump at the same station, pump #1 at the corner Marathon station. If you've never tried this you don't know how challenging it can be to get your gas at the same pump at a busy filling station.

I will also try to continue doing this experiment for as many weeks as possible to add some statistical significance to the results.

The Results

My 2008 Subaru Forester averaged 24.2 MPG with properly inflated tires during mixed highway/city driving conditions.

Table 1 and Figure 1 below show the results. I drove five weeks with properly inflated tires at 29 psi front/28 psi rear and averaged 24.2 miles per gallon. In comparison, with tires over-inflated to 40 psi front/39 psi rear I averaged 24.9 miles per gallon over five separate weeks. I checked the data with a two sample t-test to see if there is any real statistical difference between the mpg results at the two different tire pressures. This test takes into account both the average and variation of the data to determine if there is truly a difference in the results. The p-value for the test turned out to be 0.18, which means it can be said with 95% confidence that there is no statistical difference in the results and that there is no mpg benefit to driving with over-inflated tires. In other words, the averages are too close together and there is too much spread in the individual data points to say with any confidence that higher tire pressure produces a change in mpg.

There appears to be no MPG benefit from increasing your tire pressure over the car manufacturer's recommended levels.

I must say that I am both a little disappointed and surprised by the outcome. Disappointed because I was hoping to be able to save a few dollars by over-inflating my tires and surprised because it at first thought it seems firmer tires would result in better gas mileage. So, it appears the authors of the Edmunds and Popular Mechanics articles were right after all.

Table 1 - Results of Tire Pressure-Gas Mileage Experiment

Tire Pressure (psi)
Distance Driven (miles)
Gas Consumed (gallons)

Figure 1 - Miles Per Gallon Versus Tire Pressure


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      jalapeno 2 years ago

      The lack of statistical significance in your results, is a direct product of the amount of uncontrolled variables in your methodology. Additionally, which was pointed out in many eloquent comments to the cited Popular Mechanics article, the odometer in your car will register less distance when the tires are more inflated. The odometer only measures wheel rotations, not actual distance traveled. Inflating a tire to a higher pressure increases the diameter slightly, but more importantly it reduces the degree to which the tire is 'flattened' at the point of contact with the pavement. This of course is the very reason that rolling resistance goes up as inflation pressure is reduced, and conversely. The actual distance traveled for one wheel rotation, is 2πr, where 'r' is the 'working radius', that is, the distance from the center of the wheel to the pavement (i.e. less than the tire's radius when not bearing the weight of the vehicle). When you drive the same ACTUAL distance on a tire with higher pressure, the odometer will measure a shorter distance, because the vehicle travels further on each rotation. The way around this is to test the amount of gas consumed over a fixed course, and ignore the inevitable variations in the odometer readings. The results in the PM article actually support this, as the return trip with 'normal' tire pressure, over 'the same route', registered a longer distance. Additionally, the PM test compared a trip with ~ 1000 feet elevation gain (with the higher PSI), agains one with ~1000 feet of elevation loss. i.e., it also is bunk.

    • profile image

      John Salo 3 years ago

      Bunk is correct.

      I did a very similar test using a 91 Ford probe with a v6 engine.

      Without going into details I got about 4 MPG better.

      I also added a product called TUF - Oil to the engine oil and got 2 MPG more.

      I then inflated the tires to 50 lbs and got an additional 4 MPG.

      Unfortunately the car was hard to stop.


    • profile image

      Joe Schmoe 3 years ago

      Also you did not do an ABA test. You used completely variable driving conditions, weather variables, gas variables etc. The only consistency of your data lies in the PSI was checked, the miles driven were not controlled in any way (only logged by miles driven) and this will give you a different result each time.

      Check out for true "A-B-A testing" information. This will give you a true scientific testing procedure to get better accurate results.

    • theframjak profile image

      theframjak 3 years ago from East Coast

      Hey Tom, That's interesting. Did you perform a detailed analysis of gas mileage vs tire pressure? If so I would like to see the results of your study. The dynamics of motor homes may be different than passenger cars. I look forward to hearing from you.

    • profile image

      Tom Saroch 3 years ago

      Bunk. I read the same 2 articles, you are mistaken on what they said---period . Also all the data you gave appeared very scientific, it is bound to be incorrect. Please , I am not giving you a hard time. However, it simply is not correct. Physics does not lie. Less rolling resistance equals better mpg---period. I drive 4 different vehicles plus a class A motor home, & each gets better mpg with increased tire pressure up to a reasonable point.