NASCAR Chasing a “Game 7” That Doesn't Exist

Updated on January 17, 2019
anotherleftturn profile image

Mike Roush has been writing for many years about the world of NASCAR.

Brian France has been the driving force behind NASCAR's push for "Game 7" moments
Brian France has been the driving force behind NASCAR's push for "Game 7" moments | Source

One of the better slogans NASCAR's PR department has rolled out of late was its “More than just a game” ad campaign. The ads reminded casual and lapsed fans that auto racing brings an element of speed and excitement that none of the stick and ball sports can match. Yet, in its never-ending quest to create additional excitement, NASCAR is risking some of the very things that made it popular in the first place. And in attempting to create a “Game 7” atmosphere at Homestead, the sanctioning body is ignoring how drama is created in the first place.

While NASCAR has yet to confirm any specific changes, it seems clear that the Chase will change once again in the near future. The latest trial balloon out of Charlotte involves expanding the initial Chase field and then utilizing a knockout format to eliminate competitors as the playoffs move along. The finale at Homestead would then involve a second points reset giving all of the remaining drivers an equal chance to take home the championship.

Proponents of the system have long drawn the parallel to stick and ball sport playoffs, where teams are eliminated from championship contention as the season draws down. The net result in those sports is that the champion generally represents the team playing its best “when the stakes are the highest”. The best overall team may or may not win; perhaps the best example of this came a few years back in the NFL. The New York Giants won the Super Bowl by taking down the previously undefeated (and virtually unchallenged) New England Patriots, ending their dream of a 19-0 season. Football fans accept that this is normal; the results of an entire season nullified by the events of a single game.

Carl Edwards went down to the wire in NASCAR's closest title race ever (2011)
Carl Edwards went down to the wire in NASCAR's closest title race ever (2011) | Source
A Cup title once spoke to your ability to survive as much as it did to win
A Cup title once spoke to your ability to survive as much as it did to win | Source

NASCAR fans generally don't look at things the same way. For decades, the championship went not to the car who was fastest in a single race nor the team that could dominate for short periods of time. The very phrase “checkers or wreckers” was a term applied with scorn to drivers who, while talented, lacked the necessary discipline to make consistent finishes. One doesn't need to look at the history books long to see that the driver with the most wins was never a lock to win the title.

The Chase, instituted by Brian France in 2004, aimed to change that. No longer did a driver need to be the most consistent over the entire season. As long as a team made it into the field they had a legitimate shot at a title. The addition of wild cards for race wins only enhanced the change; Tony Stewart's 2011 championship was a perfect example of this. The team struggled so mightily that crew chief Darian Grubb was told his services would not be required beyond the end of the year. Yet Smoke caught fire at the right moment, reeling off a series of wins to close the season and edge Carl Edwards out for the title.

Whatever the motives in its creation, long time fans have been near-universal in their condemnation of the format. To this day, many consider Jimmie Johnson's six championships to lack the same legitimacy of those won by Earnhardt or Petty. A cursory Google search will show any number of websites that calculate the points based on the old format- and posts from fans claiming that Jeff Gordon is the real six-pack champion (or that Kevin Harvick and Carl Edwards ought to have Cups on their mantle). There is no way to know what the points battles might have looked like; Johnson works within the rules of his day just as Petty and Earnhardt did before. Would his team have focused more on the mid-season stretch that's served as a de facto testing session over the past decade? Would momentum have meant more to his competitors if they knew their points lead would stick past Richmond? We'll never know.

What is certain is that in an era of declining attendance and television ratings NASCAR should be doing everything they can to attract fans. Instead, the sport seems determined to attract casual fans who by their very nature lack the same emotional (and financial) investment in the product. Casual fans might leave the television on if what's there interests them. Hardcore fans not only leave the race on, they spend real money on merchandise and race tickets.

The Winter Classic, the NHL's most popular move in years, is an example of giving old-school fans what they want
The Winter Classic, the NHL's most popular move in years, is an example of giving old-school fans what they want | Source

Hockey faced the same sort of dilemma. The NHL spent much of the 90's expanding into non-traditional markets in a search for their own casual fan. They instituted rules designed to appeal to people who didn't traditionally follow the sport and the television presentation changed to accommodate their lack of knowledge. Fox went so far as to color the puck and add red streaks for hard shots to help these new fans follow the on-ice action.

Instead of drawing in new fans, the NHL succeeded merely in turning away those who truly loved the product. Atlanta, not exactly a hotbed of hockey fandom, watched its franchise struggle to garner any interest before seeing it move to Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The Phoenix Coyotes spent years in bankruptcy court being managed by the league. The financial imbalance between hockey haves and have-nots, caused in large part by vastly inequal fanbases, resulted in a pair of work stoppages. The NHL has stopped the bleeding mainly by recognizing what they are- and what they are not. In the process, they've thrown 20 years away.

Denny Hamlin had a miserable 2013 but he won at Homestead. Would he be a worthy season champion?
Denny Hamlin had a miserable 2013 but he won at Homestead. Would he be a worthy season champion? | Source

So while NASCAR cannot focus entirely on the desires of a vocal but aging portion of its fans, neither can they afford to disregard everything they say. Doing so risks everything the sport has gained over the last 35 years. Fans flocked to NASCAR because it offered something different, something that they other sports could not provide; drama that doesn't necessarily depend on wins and losses.

The inherent difference in fan expectations is ultimately why a Chase featuring eliminations will blow up in NASCAR's face. Imagine a Giants-Patriots scenario playing out in stock car racing. Driver A, who struggles to finish among the top ten all season long, manages to qualify for the playoffs on the strength of a mad scramble at Talladega early in the year. Meanwhile, Driver B proves dominant throughout the year. He wins 15 races and averages a top ten finish in the others. He takes home trophies from intermediate tracks, road courses and everything in between.

As the season pulls toward a conclusion, Driver B continues to run up front while Driver A struggles to stay above the cut line. Thanks to mechanical issues for his peers, he somehow snags the fourth slot going into Homestead. Is there anyone who honestly believes that if Driver A out-points his peers in the finale that he deserves a Sprint Cup trophy? Two wins and a handful of top ten finishes vs. 15 wins and 25 top ten finishes- which of those results is a championship season? And if fans question the legitimacy of Johnson's titles, what do you think they will say for Driver A's?

Can all of these teams qualify for NASCAR's "playoffs"? And would you want them to?
Can all of these teams qualify for NASCAR's "playoffs"? And would you want them to? | Source
Would Johnson be any less dominant under an elimination system? We may be about to find out
Would Johnson be any less dominant under an elimination system? We may be about to find out | Source

NASCAR has also looked to expand the Chase field in the past over basic economics. More playoff spots equal more teams receiving higher sponsor exposure and more fans emotionally invested in the Chase. Yet what happens the first time a big-name driver is eliminated early on? As things sit today, teams have the ability to come back from one poor run. The “Chase Mulligan” so talked about means that teams can recover from a blown engine or crash (particularly with races at Martinsville and Talladega waiting). An elimination format would create a zero-tolerance environment for mistakes. What if the aforementioned Driver B crashed on the first lap of the Chase opener. Would his previous accomplishments now mean nothing?

An elimination format also puts the ten race Chase schedule itself under an intense microscope. Drivers who excel at short tracks would cry foul at a Chase schedule that contains only the race at Martinsville. What about the carnage that regularly occurs at Talladega? Is it fair to eliminate teams when the result is almost always out of their control? And what about the possibility of adding a road course to the Chase; for the many teams who struggle at the two already on the schedule, how would they (and their sponsors/fans) react to an event that would almost guarantee their elimination?

I believe that Brian France's heart is in the right place. He seems to genuinely believe in the concept of a Chase and that having a playoff system is the key to making NASCAR relevant once again. The devil, however, is in the details. If he genuinely wants to increase fan interest and emotional investment, the first step should be the weekly product on the track. Fans who enjoy watching a race and care about the drivers involved will come back for more- the 80's and 90's proved that point. Many of those years had runaway title races and yet it didn't matter. That, not last year's NBA Finals, should be NASCAR's goal.

Now it's your turn:

What do you think of an elimination-format Chase?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Beau Jenyns 

      2 weeks ago

      It is very interesting, as an e-sportsman I have read something about a lot already, but it was interesting to go deeper into this topic. I also write my materials, go to and get acquainted with the interesting materials in the essay about video games, this is popular, it reveals the depth of questions and problems related to their impact on sports, on people , to health, to peace and prospects. Good luck, victories and development to everyone!

    • profile image

      David Hartley 

      18 months ago

      Es tut mir leid auf Deutsch zu schreiben, es fällt mir sehr schwer, Nachrichten auf Englisch zu schreiben. Dank solcher Ereignisse habe ich Computerspiele geliebt, ich mag es zu spielen Need for Speed und viele andere Computerspiele Wenn es diejenigen gibt, die Computerspiele mögen, dann spiele ich gerne mit Ihnen.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      I have followed NASCAR since 1962. We would drive 90 miles to Buffalo from Pa to watch Daytona 500 at a theater. If they change to new format I don't think I would go to my chair to watch on TV!!


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)